What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


General Philatelic/Gen. Discussion : Big stamps - What Do You Think?

 

Author
Postings
Guthrum
Members Picture


20 May 2015
06:47:21pm
I must admit that until lately I tended to dismiss all big stamps out of hand. They were clearly not made to lick and affix, merely to attract child collectors impressed by size. Occasionally they drew attention to the country's inflated opinion of itself. Often a poor design was made poorer by being the more visible. I overheard a couple of old guys at a stamp fair loudly excoriating big stamps as 'cheese labels' (that was when I was a not-so-old guy).

Lately a Russian set has been posted in that section of the board which has caused a slight revision of opinion. Despite the fact that the stamps were almost certainly produced for collectors, as well as reflecting a certain self-regard, they were actually beautifully produced (engraving, naturally) and suited their Cinemascope format ideally.

But I think they are exceptions. A stamp really ought to have something to do with postage, don't you think?

Like
Login to Like
this post
roy
Members Picture


BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50 - Easy browsing 300 categories

20 May 2015
07:08:50pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Modern covers with the large French Art stamps sell as fast as I can put them up:

Image Not Found

Roy

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50- 10,000+ new covers coming Tuesday June 1"

www.Buckacover.com
larsdog
Members Picture


APS #220693 ATA#57179

20 May 2015
08:13:10pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I rather liked the large format U.S. Circus stamps recently. I thought they were real attention-getters!

Lars

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

www.larsdog.com/stamps
xstitchalanna
Members Picture


Wanting to bring the joy of stamp collecting to younger generations

21 May 2015
06:53:52am
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I'd have to agree with Lars. Especially these days with email and digital postage, mail just looks plain boring. Stamps are hardly on mail anymore. I even get happy for a "presorted standard" when it's on an envelope in my mailbox! Maybe if people notice the stamp it will get people more interested in the hobby?

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Jansimon
Members Picture


21 May 2015
07:17:25am

Auctions - Approvals
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Do you also prefer cd booklets over vinyl record sleeves?

Personally I think a design is good or bad regardless of its size, although I think that a larger canvas will give the designer more space to do his/her work and small stamps often lead to fiddly work that can only be appreciated with a magnifying glass.

Jan-Simon

Like
Login to Like
this post

www.pagowirense.nl/stamps/
BobbyBarnhart
Members Picture


They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -Benjamin Franklin

21 May 2015
08:54:28am
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Jansimon is 100% correct, IMHO. The early art stamps of France were some of the most attractive issues of the 20th century (ofc you can hardly say that the artwork was original with the stamp designers). I doubt that the paintings depicted on those stamps would have been as beautiful in a smaller format.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. -Edmund Burke"

www.bobbybarnhart.net
smauggie
Members Picture


21 May 2015
11:43:59am
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Of course if the stamps are too big for your envelope you can always overlap them.

Image Not Found

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

canalzonepostalhistory.wordpress.com
rvangorder
Members Picture


APS life member of 25+ years

21 May 2015
01:43:58pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I have never been concerned with the size of a stamp. I have a stamp that is one-quarter of an inch on a side and I have the $10 blue whale definitive from Canada, which is a big as they get. There are mini-sheets and 8.5" x 11" souvenier sheets out there as well.

Some countries issue stamps specifically for collectors and they may be cheap and lack character yet at the same time can be appealing in their own way. Bhutan's phonograph records and CD stamps are gimmicks yet they are avidly sought after and are high value items.

Ignoring a stamp because of its size or other attributes means you have a limited collection that lacks variety and appeal to others, but if you like it, that is all that matters in the end.

Like
Login to Like
this post
Guthrum
Members Picture


21 May 2015
02:55:23pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

@ jansimon - my LP covers are my pride and joy. Though in a box, under the stairs. CD inserts are all very well, but cassette tape inserts were altogether too small!

A good few responses here are concerned with value or sales potential, rather than trying to establish the point or practicality of big stamps. Let's look at it from another angle: why do you suppose the Penny Black was created in its particular dimensions - not bigger or smaller? Did it not provide a normative template for definitive stamps from many countries thereafter?


Like
Login to Like
this post
nl1947

21 May 2015
03:19:51pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

A stamp mainly for postage should be a "convenient" size especially if it has little to offer in terms of visual content.
However the stamp size & shape should probably primarily reflect the content while still being relatively convenient for postage use. A balance between both is ideal.
Although not necessarily ideal for postage use, these 2 reversed in content would not be appealing.

Image Not Found


Like 
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
michael78651
Members Picture


21 May 2015
09:32:15pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

"Of course if the stamps are too big for your envelope you can always overlap them."



LOL. Not in the USA. Such an envelope would most likely (should) get rejected and returned to sender. I'm not sure, however, how the computerized sorting machines will catch it if a clerk doesn't.
Like
Login to Like
this post

www.hipstamp.com/store/the-online-stamp-shop
larsdog
Members Picture


APS #220693 ATA#57179

22 May 2015
12:29:52am
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

"A good few responses here are concerned with value or sales potential, rather than trying to establish the point or practicality of big stamps. Let's look at it from another angle: why do you suppose the Penny Black was created in its particular dimensions - not bigger or smaller? Did it not provide a normative template for definitive stamps from many countries thereafter?"



Two points:

1. For some issues, big stamps make sense. I expect 19th Century U.S. Newspaper stamps were so big to make them easy to spot in a bundle of newspapers. Esthetically, the Circus commemoratives depicting circus posters SHOULD be large format.

2. For definitives, the size has been rather fixed. In the U.S. our original issue size is pretty much the same size of a modern stamp. We expanded size a bit with the Banknotes and came back down with the Baby Banknotes. In 1981 we attempted to make stamps even smaller (to save on paper costs), but that experiment was roundly rejected by the public.

Was the penny black "perfect" in its conception, or are humans just resistant to change? Be careful in how you draw your conclusions!

Lars

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

www.larsdog.com/stamps
Guthrum
Members Picture


22 May 2015
05:38:17am
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I like that upper-case SHOULD, Lars! And indeed the possibility of an aesthetic (rather than pragmatic) decision in the phrase "roundly rejected by the public".

I do not suggest that a penny black was perfect in its conception, only that Rowland Hill specified its dimensions for a reason, and indeed altered his original specification from a square stamp (boo! hiss! see my outrage elsewhere!) to a 6:7 linear ratio.

The reason behind this was to incorporate the words 'one penny' at the bottom. The rider "Or if practicable increase the length One eighth and insert in white letters at the bottom One Penny" (in his instructions to Perkins, Baker & Petch) can be interpreted either way: Hill did not like the look of a square stamp and knew a 'portrait' format would be aesthetically more pleasing; or Hill was not really bothered about proportion but felt that a stamp needed a visible denomination.

I don't believe aesthetics are entirely a matter of personal preference, nor do I think subsequent stamp producers mimicked Hill's 6:7 ratio because they were resistant to change. I do think there's a range of proportions outside which stamps just look ugly, and I suspect that goes for size as well.


Like
Login to Like
this post
ernieinjax
Members Picture


22 May 2015
01:17:47pm
re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

oh, come on... size doesn't matter. Rolling On The Floor Laughing

Like 
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
Guthrum

20 May 2015
06:47:21pm

I must admit that until lately I tended to dismiss all big stamps out of hand. They were clearly not made to lick and affix, merely to attract child collectors impressed by size. Occasionally they drew attention to the country's inflated opinion of itself. Often a poor design was made poorer by being the more visible. I overheard a couple of old guys at a stamp fair loudly excoriating big stamps as 'cheese labels' (that was when I was a not-so-old guy).

Lately a Russian set has been posted in that section of the board which has caused a slight revision of opinion. Despite the fact that the stamps were almost certainly produced for collectors, as well as reflecting a certain self-regard, they were actually beautifully produced (engraving, naturally) and suited their Cinemascope format ideally.

But I think they are exceptions. A stamp really ought to have something to do with postage, don't you think?

Like
Login to Like
this post

BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50 - Easy browsing 300 categories
20 May 2015
07:08:50pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Modern covers with the large French Art stamps sell as fast as I can put them up:

Image Not Found

Roy

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50- 10,000+ new covers coming Tuesday June 1"

www.Buckacover.com
Members Picture
larsdog

APS #220693 ATA#57179
20 May 2015
08:13:10pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I rather liked the large format U.S. Circus stamps recently. I thought they were real attention-getters!

Lars

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

www.larsdog.com/stam ...

Wanting to bring the joy of stamp collecting to younger generations
21 May 2015
06:53:52am

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I'd have to agree with Lars. Especially these days with email and digital postage, mail just looks plain boring. Stamps are hardly on mail anymore. I even get happy for a "presorted standard" when it's on an envelope in my mailbox! Maybe if people notice the stamp it will get people more interested in the hobby?

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
Jansimon

21 May 2015
07:17:25am

Auctions - Approvals

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Do you also prefer cd booklets over vinyl record sleeves?

Personally I think a design is good or bad regardless of its size, although I think that a larger canvas will give the designer more space to do his/her work and small stamps often lead to fiddly work that can only be appreciated with a magnifying glass.

Jan-Simon

Like
Login to Like
this post

www.pagowirense.nl/s ...

They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -Benjamin Franklin
21 May 2015
08:54:28am

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Jansimon is 100% correct, IMHO. The early art stamps of France were some of the most attractive issues of the 20th century (ofc you can hardly say that the artwork was original with the stamp designers). I doubt that the paintings depicted on those stamps would have been as beautiful in a smaller format.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. -Edmund Burke"

www.bobbybarnhart.ne ...
Members Picture
smauggie

21 May 2015
11:43:59am

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

Of course if the stamps are too big for your envelope you can always overlap them.

Image Not Found

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

canalzonepostalhisto ...
Members Picture
rvangorder

APS life member of 25+ years
21 May 2015
01:43:58pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I have never been concerned with the size of a stamp. I have a stamp that is one-quarter of an inch on a side and I have the $10 blue whale definitive from Canada, which is a big as they get. There are mini-sheets and 8.5" x 11" souvenier sheets out there as well.

Some countries issue stamps specifically for collectors and they may be cheap and lack character yet at the same time can be appealing in their own way. Bhutan's phonograph records and CD stamps are gimmicks yet they are avidly sought after and are high value items.

Ignoring a stamp because of its size or other attributes means you have a limited collection that lacks variety and appeal to others, but if you like it, that is all that matters in the end.

Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
Guthrum

21 May 2015
02:55:23pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

@ jansimon - my LP covers are my pride and joy. Though in a box, under the stairs. CD inserts are all very well, but cassette tape inserts were altogether too small!

A good few responses here are concerned with value or sales potential, rather than trying to establish the point or practicality of big stamps. Let's look at it from another angle: why do you suppose the Penny Black was created in its particular dimensions - not bigger or smaller? Did it not provide a normative template for definitive stamps from many countries thereafter?


Like
Login to Like
this post
nl1947

21 May 2015
03:19:51pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

A stamp mainly for postage should be a "convenient" size especially if it has little to offer in terms of visual content.
However the stamp size & shape should probably primarily reflect the content while still being relatively convenient for postage use. A balance between both is ideal.
Although not necessarily ideal for postage use, these 2 reversed in content would not be appealing.

Image Not Found


Like 
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
michael78651

21 May 2015
09:32:15pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

"Of course if the stamps are too big for your envelope you can always overlap them."



LOL. Not in the USA. Such an envelope would most likely (should) get rejected and returned to sender. I'm not sure, however, how the computerized sorting machines will catch it if a clerk doesn't.
Like
Login to Like
this post

www.hipstamp.com/sto ...
Members Picture
larsdog

APS #220693 ATA#57179
22 May 2015
12:29:52am

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

"A good few responses here are concerned with value or sales potential, rather than trying to establish the point or practicality of big stamps. Let's look at it from another angle: why do you suppose the Penny Black was created in its particular dimensions - not bigger or smaller? Did it not provide a normative template for definitive stamps from many countries thereafter?"



Two points:

1. For some issues, big stamps make sense. I expect 19th Century U.S. Newspaper stamps were so big to make them easy to spot in a bundle of newspapers. Esthetically, the Circus commemoratives depicting circus posters SHOULD be large format.

2. For definitives, the size has been rather fixed. In the U.S. our original issue size is pretty much the same size of a modern stamp. We expanded size a bit with the Banknotes and came back down with the Baby Banknotes. In 1981 we attempted to make stamps even smaller (to save on paper costs), but that experiment was roundly rejected by the public.

Was the penny black "perfect" in its conception, or are humans just resistant to change? Be careful in how you draw your conclusions!

Lars

Like
Login to Like
this post

"Expanding your knowledge faster than your collection can save you a few bucks."

www.larsdog.com/stam ...
Members Picture
Guthrum

22 May 2015
05:38:17am

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

I like that upper-case SHOULD, Lars! And indeed the possibility of an aesthetic (rather than pragmatic) decision in the phrase "roundly rejected by the public".

I do not suggest that a penny black was perfect in its conception, only that Rowland Hill specified its dimensions for a reason, and indeed altered his original specification from a square stamp (boo! hiss! see my outrage elsewhere!) to a 6:7 linear ratio.

The reason behind this was to incorporate the words 'one penny' at the bottom. The rider "Or if practicable increase the length One eighth and insert in white letters at the bottom One Penny" (in his instructions to Perkins, Baker & Petch) can be interpreted either way: Hill did not like the look of a square stamp and knew a 'portrait' format would be aesthetically more pleasing; or Hill was not really bothered about proportion but felt that a stamp needed a visible denomination.

I don't believe aesthetics are entirely a matter of personal preference, nor do I think subsequent stamp producers mimicked Hill's 6:7 ratio because they were resistant to change. I do think there's a range of proportions outside which stamps just look ugly, and I suspect that goes for size as well.


Like
Login to Like
this post
Members Picture
ernieinjax

22 May 2015
01:17:47pm

re: Big stamps - What Do You Think?

oh, come on... size doesn't matter. Rolling On The Floor Laughing

Like 
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com