i could say "wow" now, and "why wait?"
An afterthought:
"Wow, look at that - India Post was still using dot matrix printers...in 2018!"
Stolen? Not this one:
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey
Actually dot matrix printers are still used for a variety of applications and are often used to deal with heavy-duty and automated printing functions.
OK, smauggie, but I challenge you to produce anything printed by USPS in the last year, or three, on a dot matrix printer!
Nice cover, ikey!
I like the juxtaposition of the orthodox theme in the imperf self-adhesive(?) stamp at the top and the (unorthodox) Olympic theme in the 1.50PT stamp at the bottom.
-Paul
"OK, smauggie, but I challenge you to produce anything printed by USPS in the last year, or three, on a dot matrix printer!"
Smauggie, my implication is simply that dot matrix printing is outdated technology, by just about anyone's definition in 2018, apparently except India Post's.
Not better, not worse, just outdated.
"Outdated" is an assertion, subject to proof to the contrary, ie, contemporary usage.
Would love to be refuted.
pigdoc,
You may want to dial down the rhetoric just a bit.
Or not.
Lars
"Actually dot matrix printers are still used for a variety of applications and are often used to deal with heavy-duty and automated printing functions. "
Dot matrix printers are still used by airlines at their gates for printing out passenger lists and reports for the pilot. They are real workhorses. I have one around here somewhere - now I want to dig it out
Geoff
Just don't mail out your resume printed dot matrix!
I certainly won’t say that modern covers can't be interesting! Most of those I receive aren’t very interesting, at least to me. I haven’t collected “the world” since about 1957, when I realized the futility of filling every page of my three-volume Scott International album, discovered girls, and basically forgot about collecting. When I started collecting again, about 1980, I “specialized” in Canada, stamps at first, and then postal history. My interests slowly broadened into Eire and Scandinavia, which I dropped after a few years when collecting new issues became a fool’s errand), and started new collections, one at a time, over the next several years. One of those is the Vietnam War, of which I am a veteran.
An interesting set of stamps I am working to complete was issued by North Vietnam in 1954-55, commemorating the communist Viet Minh victory over the French Army at Dien Bien Phu, the battle that resulted in the end of French influence in Vietnam and the decision of the Geneva Convention to partition the country into North and South Vietnam.
The design of the stamps, common to each of four values, is based on a photograph or photographs of a Viet Minh soldier standing on a French bunker on the day the battle ended. The stamps, issued without gum, were printed in perforate and imperforate versions. All but one of them, the imperf 10d stamp, are relatively easy to obtain in mint and CTO condition. Postally used copies of these stamps aren’t common, so I was pleased to find this postally used, perforated copy of the 150d stamp on the Delcampe web site:
The stamp arrived from Saigon a couple of days ago, and I’m as pleased with the cover as with the stamp. It’s franked with a 2017 souvenir sheet and stamp commemorating General Nguyen Giap, who died in 2013; the design pictures Giap in uniform, and a scene in the background similar to that of the Dien Bien Phu stamp shown above.
Here's a larger image of the 3000d stamp on the cover:
This is the photograph that the design is based on:
At Dien Bien Phu, Giap’s troops brought in heavy artillery, moving weapons through difficult terrain up the steep rear slopes of the mountains surrounding the French positions, dug tunnels through the mountain, and placed the artillery pieces overlooking the French encampment. This positioning of the artillery made it nearly impervious to French counter-battery fire; the French artillery officer who planned the defence of the valley shot himself before the end of the battle.
One of the interesting things about my new cover is that it was postmarked in Saigon, not in Ho Chi Minh City, which is the city’s official name, bestowed by the communists after they defeated South Vietnam. Apparently officials don’t always get their way!
Bob
thanks for this, Corpsman.
Dien Bien Phu, for those who don't know it, was a defensive nightmare, built in the cup of a valley, meaning that all surronding ground was higher.
Air superiority and ability to dominate the landscape with artillery fire was assumed to be sufficient to overpower the Viet Minh. As Bob notes, artillery counterfire failed, and air power, especially the ability to resupply was lost, as enemy units brought antiaircraft fire to bear on the landstrips.
France, like America 20 years later, was exhausted by the war. The great victory turned into the final nail.
It should be noted that French and allied Vietnamese troops fought valiantly, and might have won had they been given better terrain. Alas, it was a death trap of their leaders' making.
Finally, in this the 50th Anniversary of the Battle of Hue and the Tet Offensive, if American politicians and military men had been paying attention, they might have noticed that the Viet Minh were willing to pay a high price to drive invaders out. Perhaps they might have given second thought to starting something they were unlikely to outlast.
sorry to steal your thread Bob.
David & Bob:
Fascinating history! Thank-you for sharing.
David
"One of those is the Vietnam War, of which I am a veteran."
Here are two more modern Vietnam covers that seem to meld the Saigon and Ho Chi Minh City distinctions:
Of particular interest is the CDS on the reverse that has BOTH Saigon and Ho Chi Minh City indicia.
This is just the backside of another cover. Both of these are from dealers who I bought some of my Vietnam material from.
-Paul
...and finally, (for today) here is just one more example of an incredible modern cover, from a dealer in Taiwan whom I have bought from multiple times. I have 3 of these covers in hand, all very similar, but different:
If the dealer/sender was hoping to cement brand loyalty by creating covers like these, I have but one response:
"It's WORKING!"
Let us all take a lesson.
-Paul
To prevent further hijacking of Pigdoc's thread with posts about old covers, I'm going open a new thread about old U.S. airmail covers, starting with the earliest one in my collection, posted in 1918, just 16 days after the inauguration of U.S. airmail service.
In the meantime, here's another interesting modern cover, interesting to me at least because of the franking, picturing one of my favourite airliners, the Lockheed Constellation:
Here's a larger image of the stamps:
In 1962, I flew from Travis Air Force Base in California to Tachikawa AFB near Tokyo in a Military Air Transports System (MATS) Consellation. We landed at Hickam AFB in Hawaii and at Wake Island for fuel and food; the flight time, not counting stops, was 26 hours. For details and photographs, see my web page, Low & Slow in a “Connie” — Flying to Japan in 1963.
One of the advantages of modern covers is that stamps franking them are generally printed with high production values. For me, they provide attractive collateral material to display along with older covers and stamps.
Bob
BEAUTIFUL, Bob!
Here's another, received in today's mail, from Israel:
Wow, label again printed with a dot matrix printer. Justification of the page break is off. Bilingual, but I would be amazed if the Hebrew printed on it is readable. And, it includes a religious symbol (the menorah), not typical of US government documents.
-Paul
Got this in the mail last month...
Don
Awesome!
Laughing my a__ off, Don!
Thanks!
Brilliant!
In yesterday's mail:
Highham Hills. What a charming name!
-Paul
"... but I would be amazed if the Hebrew printed on it is readable ..."
Although not a full cover, still interesting.
Wish who ever cut this out had kept the original.
Um yeah.
How is it that postage paid in Papua, New Guinea got machine cancelled in El Paso, TX?
And, then, does the "PLEASE POST X-MAS MAIL THIS WEEK" suggest that the citizenry of Papua, New Guinea mandates a Christian secularism in their official acts (such as mail handling)?
-Paul
it looks like two different US machine cancels
I am hesitant to ever disagree with amsd, but:
Re PLEASE POST X-MAS MAIL THIS WEEK
Americans don't use the word "post" as a verb.
Searching Moe Luff's United States Postal Slogan Cancels (1950) - which we can imagine has been imperfectly OCR'd - we find several US cancels in the form "MAIL EARLY" but none with the verb "POST".
NB: Mr Luff's compilation is thru 1950, while this cover is postmarked 1987, but I don't think that American usage has changed.
Therefor, I suspect that the slogan is a PNG slogan, asking their customers to cut them a little slack, perhaps applied only to outbound international mail.
The WikiGod says:
"Although English is an official language of Papua New Guinea, it is only spoken by 1–2% of the population."
For your perusal, two covers I picked up minutes ago at my local PO:
The "not 2/26" inscriptions are by my carrier, applied yesterday, indicating that I wasn't home when she knocked on my door for a signature.
I'll throw these in a shoebox, and decades later, someone will find them and say, "Wow!"
So, now, challenge ON!
Whaddaya got?
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
i could say "wow" now, and "why wait?"
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
An afterthought:
"Wow, look at that - India Post was still using dot matrix printers...in 2018!"
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Stolen? Not this one:
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Actually dot matrix printers are still used for a variety of applications and are often used to deal with heavy-duty and automated printing functions.
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
OK, smauggie, but I challenge you to produce anything printed by USPS in the last year, or three, on a dot matrix printer!
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Nice cover, ikey!
I like the juxtaposition of the orthodox theme in the imperf self-adhesive(?) stamp at the top and the (unorthodox) Olympic theme in the 1.50PT stamp at the bottom.
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
"OK, smauggie, but I challenge you to produce anything printed by USPS in the last year, or three, on a dot matrix printer!"
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Smauggie, my implication is simply that dot matrix printing is outdated technology, by just about anyone's definition in 2018, apparently except India Post's.
Not better, not worse, just outdated.
"Outdated" is an assertion, subject to proof to the contrary, ie, contemporary usage.
Would love to be refuted.
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
pigdoc,
You may want to dial down the rhetoric just a bit.
Or not.
Lars
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
"Actually dot matrix printers are still used for a variety of applications and are often used to deal with heavy-duty and automated printing functions. "
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Dot matrix printers are still used by airlines at their gates for printing out passenger lists and reports for the pilot. They are real workhorses. I have one around here somewhere - now I want to dig it out
Geoff
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Just don't mail out your resume printed dot matrix!
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
I certainly won’t say that modern covers can't be interesting! Most of those I receive aren’t very interesting, at least to me. I haven’t collected “the world” since about 1957, when I realized the futility of filling every page of my three-volume Scott International album, discovered girls, and basically forgot about collecting. When I started collecting again, about 1980, I “specialized” in Canada, stamps at first, and then postal history. My interests slowly broadened into Eire and Scandinavia, which I dropped after a few years when collecting new issues became a fool’s errand), and started new collections, one at a time, over the next several years. One of those is the Vietnam War, of which I am a veteran.
An interesting set of stamps I am working to complete was issued by North Vietnam in 1954-55, commemorating the communist Viet Minh victory over the French Army at Dien Bien Phu, the battle that resulted in the end of French influence in Vietnam and the decision of the Geneva Convention to partition the country into North and South Vietnam.
The design of the stamps, common to each of four values, is based on a photograph or photographs of a Viet Minh soldier standing on a French bunker on the day the battle ended. The stamps, issued without gum, were printed in perforate and imperforate versions. All but one of them, the imperf 10d stamp, are relatively easy to obtain in mint and CTO condition. Postally used copies of these stamps aren’t common, so I was pleased to find this postally used, perforated copy of the 150d stamp on the Delcampe web site:
The stamp arrived from Saigon a couple of days ago, and I’m as pleased with the cover as with the stamp. It’s franked with a 2017 souvenir sheet and stamp commemorating General Nguyen Giap, who died in 2013; the design pictures Giap in uniform, and a scene in the background similar to that of the Dien Bien Phu stamp shown above.
Here's a larger image of the 3000d stamp on the cover:
This is the photograph that the design is based on:
At Dien Bien Phu, Giap’s troops brought in heavy artillery, moving weapons through difficult terrain up the steep rear slopes of the mountains surrounding the French positions, dug tunnels through the mountain, and placed the artillery pieces overlooking the French encampment. This positioning of the artillery made it nearly impervious to French counter-battery fire; the French artillery officer who planned the defence of the valley shot himself before the end of the battle.
One of the interesting things about my new cover is that it was postmarked in Saigon, not in Ho Chi Minh City, which is the city’s official name, bestowed by the communists after they defeated South Vietnam. Apparently officials don’t always get their way!
Bob
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
thanks for this, Corpsman.
Dien Bien Phu, for those who don't know it, was a defensive nightmare, built in the cup of a valley, meaning that all surronding ground was higher.
Air superiority and ability to dominate the landscape with artillery fire was assumed to be sufficient to overpower the Viet Minh. As Bob notes, artillery counterfire failed, and air power, especially the ability to resupply was lost, as enemy units brought antiaircraft fire to bear on the landstrips.
France, like America 20 years later, was exhausted by the war. The great victory turned into the final nail.
It should be noted that French and allied Vietnamese troops fought valiantly, and might have won had they been given better terrain. Alas, it was a death trap of their leaders' making.
Finally, in this the 50th Anniversary of the Battle of Hue and the Tet Offensive, if American politicians and military men had been paying attention, they might have noticed that the Viet Minh were willing to pay a high price to drive invaders out. Perhaps they might have given second thought to starting something they were unlikely to outlast.
sorry to steal your thread Bob.
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
David & Bob:
Fascinating history! Thank-you for sharing.
David
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
"One of those is the Vietnam War, of which I am a veteran."
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Here are two more modern Vietnam covers that seem to meld the Saigon and Ho Chi Minh City distinctions:
Of particular interest is the CDS on the reverse that has BOTH Saigon and Ho Chi Minh City indicia.
This is just the backside of another cover. Both of these are from dealers who I bought some of my Vietnam material from.
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
...and finally, (for today) here is just one more example of an incredible modern cover, from a dealer in Taiwan whom I have bought from multiple times. I have 3 of these covers in hand, all very similar, but different:
If the dealer/sender was hoping to cement brand loyalty by creating covers like these, I have but one response:
"It's WORKING!"
Let us all take a lesson.
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
To prevent further hijacking of Pigdoc's thread with posts about old covers, I'm going open a new thread about old U.S. airmail covers, starting with the earliest one in my collection, posted in 1918, just 16 days after the inauguration of U.S. airmail service.
In the meantime, here's another interesting modern cover, interesting to me at least because of the franking, picturing one of my favourite airliners, the Lockheed Constellation:
Here's a larger image of the stamps:
In 1962, I flew from Travis Air Force Base in California to Tachikawa AFB near Tokyo in a Military Air Transports System (MATS) Consellation. We landed at Hickam AFB in Hawaii and at Wake Island for fuel and food; the flight time, not counting stops, was 26 hours. For details and photographs, see my web page, Low & Slow in a “Connie” — Flying to Japan in 1963.
One of the advantages of modern covers is that stamps franking them are generally printed with high production values. For me, they provide attractive collateral material to display along with older covers and stamps.
Bob
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
BEAUTIFUL, Bob!
Here's another, received in today's mail, from Israel:
Wow, label again printed with a dot matrix printer. Justification of the page break is off. Bilingual, but I would be amazed if the Hebrew printed on it is readable. And, it includes a religious symbol (the menorah), not typical of US government documents.
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Got this in the mail last month...
Don
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Awesome!
Laughing my a__ off, Don!
Thanks!
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Brilliant!
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
In yesterday's mail:
Highham Hills. What a charming name!
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
"... but I would be amazed if the Hebrew printed on it is readable ..."
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Although not a full cover, still interesting.
Wish who ever cut this out had kept the original.
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
Um yeah.
How is it that postage paid in Papua, New Guinea got machine cancelled in El Paso, TX?
And, then, does the "PLEASE POST X-MAS MAIL THIS WEEK" suggest that the citizenry of Papua, New Guinea mandates a Christian secularism in their official acts (such as mail handling)?
-Paul
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
it looks like two different US machine cancels
re: CHALLENGE: Who says modern covers can't be interesting?
I am hesitant to ever disagree with amsd, but:
Re PLEASE POST X-MAS MAIL THIS WEEK
Americans don't use the word "post" as a verb.
Searching Moe Luff's United States Postal Slogan Cancels (1950) - which we can imagine has been imperfectly OCR'd - we find several US cancels in the form "MAIL EARLY" but none with the verb "POST".
NB: Mr Luff's compilation is thru 1950, while this cover is postmarked 1987, but I don't think that American usage has changed.
Therefor, I suspect that the slogan is a PNG slogan, asking their customers to cut them a little slack, perhaps applied only to outbound international mail.
The WikiGod says:
"Although English is an official language of Papua New Guinea, it is only spoken by 1–2% of the population."