Unfortunately, your stamp does not have a medal flaw, the image below shows what a medal flaw looks like. In the ACSC it is 189e and is valued at $30 used.
Hi Rob
Thanks for that
It is so hard to distinguish them.
Horamakhet
Hi Rob,
Still confused, these scans all are slightly different, so are any of these the medal flaw?
Horamakhet
Showing is a normal 1941 3d mauve, it shows the metallic shine to the medal in question. The stamps you have, though they show variations of the medal, none have the "medallion flaw".
Rob
hi Rob
Will keep searching
Horamakhet
Hi to all
How do you distinguish the medal flaw, they all look the same to me.
this one was in a collection I purchased.
It has written on the back in pencil
185 (SG I am assuming) 1937-49 14 x 15
Regards
Horamakhet
re: MEDAL FLAW, HOW DOES ONE DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE NORMAL
Unfortunately, your stamp does not have a medal flaw, the image below shows what a medal flaw looks like. In the ACSC it is 189e and is valued at $30 used.
re: MEDAL FLAW, HOW DOES ONE DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE NORMAL
Hi Rob
Thanks for that
It is so hard to distinguish them.
Horamakhet
re: MEDAL FLAW, HOW DOES ONE DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE NORMAL
Hi Rob,
Still confused, these scans all are slightly different, so are any of these the medal flaw?
Horamakhet
re: MEDAL FLAW, HOW DOES ONE DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE NORMAL
Showing is a normal 1941 3d mauve, it shows the metallic shine to the medal in question. The stamps you have, though they show variations of the medal, none have the "medallion flaw".
Rob
re: MEDAL FLAW, HOW DOES ONE DISTINGUISH IT FROM THE NORMAL
hi Rob
Will keep searching
Horamakhet