What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


General Philatelic/Newcomer Cnr : Forgeries/varieties/reprints

 

Author
Postings
Bobstamp
Members Picture


08 Jun 2018
11:58:10pm
Here's a suggestion: How about a thread about varieties, forgeries, and reprints that we have in collections? I recently discovered, through a web page, that several postwar Japanese stamps I have are all forgeries. Fortunately, even the original stamps aren't worth much (apparently the printing plates were sold to a Hungarian company, which proceeded to flood the philatelic market with "unofficial" reprints).

I'm thinking that it would be worthwhile if we could post clear images of our "problem" stamps, hopefully with images of the real thing. I know that I would appreciate learning how to differentiate between real and "unreal" stamps. I'll start with this Jamaica stamp, the original and an official reprint:

Image Not Found



Like 
6 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.ephemeraltreasures.net
TuskenRaider
Members Picture


09 Jun 2018
01:42:31am
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi Everyone;

I thank you Bob for this idea.

Not only do you have very sharp and clear scans, but the text that explains how to identify the two versions, is part of the bitmap file. So when I copy-and-paste this graphic image to a CorelDraw page it will automatically have everything that I need to distinguish these two different versions.

May the Force be with you...young Jedi!

Still just sortin'....
TuskenRaider

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.webstore.com/store,pgr,37572,user_id,37572,ac,shop
pigdoc

10 Jun 2018
04:56:25pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Yes, thanks Bob, for starting this topic.

One of my collecting interests is Danish colonies, and the private packet post between La Guaira, Puerto Cabello, and St Thomas must be included. Founded by Robert Todd in 1863. Letter post stamps were issued 1864-1870 and used on this packet. All three series of these stamps were heavily forged by Spiro and others. So to collect this area, one needs to be well-versed in sussing them out!

Below is the first stamp issued in this series:
Image Not Found

Left is genuine, Right is a Spiro forgery. There are many distinguishing features that give away the forgery. A couple in particular are the general shading of the smoke, sky, and sea around the ship. Another is the shape of the last S in SAN TOMAS. In the forged stamp the uppermost part has a concave dent right next to the serif. And the bogus cancel on the forgery is very characteristic. It is never seen on genuine stamps.

I have several more forgeries to share from this packet post, so stay tuned!

My primary reference is The Private Ship Letter Stamps of the World, Part 1, The Caribbean by Ringstrom and Tester.

-Paul

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
pigdoc

17 Jan 2019
11:59:30am
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Time to revive this thread!

Here are some examples of genuine and forged stamps of the Centavo series in this private packet postage issue:

Image Not Found

Top one is genuine, from the first (1864) centavo issue, bottom two are forged copies, both Type I. There are six different forgery types described for this issue.

Here is another from the same (1864) issue:
Image Not Found

Again, top stamp is genuine, bottom two are forgeries. Forgery on the L is a Type IV also with a faked cancellation. The one on the R is a Type I forgery.

My primary reference is The Private Ship Letter Stamps of the World, Part 1, The Caribbean by Ringstrom and Tester. The author describes the forgeries of this issue, "...none are particularly dangerous." Hallmarks of genuine stamps are the shape of the horizontal part of the "L" in "LA GUAIRA" and extension of the shading lines across the right hand outer frame lines.

In the marketplace, the prevalence of forged stamps is similar to that of genuine stamps. It is as interesting to collect all the different forged types as it is to collect genuine stamps!

Who's next?
-Paul

-Paul

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
keesindy
Members Picture


17 Jan 2019
03:51:49pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

I posted this image in another thread quite a while ago, but some newer members might enjoy seeing this. It is Scott #59 and SG #81a.

I had purchased a Gambia collection containing this stamp. It wasn't identified in the sale and I didn't know anything about this variety because Scott doesn't list it. When I later purchased a Stanley Gibbons catalogue and learned about this variety, I went back and looked for any stamps I might have with the "dent." I was very happy to discover I had this one!

Tom

Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
keesindy
Members Picture


17 Jan 2019
04:14:38pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

These stamps are Scott Azores #112 violet color. I don't any have information regarding minor color varieties, but I believe the first copy is the normal color and the second copy is what I am calling dark violet.

Image Not Found Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
keesindy
Members Picture


17 Jan 2019
04:31:31pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

The Queen Victoria set of stamps for Somaliland Protectorate are overprinted India stamps. Stanley Gibbons identifies two types of overprints. Type A has the "B" of BRITISH positioned directly over the "M" of SOMALILAND. Type B has the "B" of BRITISH positioned over the "OM" of SOMALILAND. In some cases, the "B" is not clearly in either position, but somewhere between. There are other undocumented (as far as I know) variations in the sizes and vertical positioning of the overprint letters.

Image Not Found Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
1938324
Members Picture


18 Jan 2019
07:43:25am

Auctions - Approvals
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Can anyone identify this Macao #12 Portuguese Crown stamp as a Reprint or not? Thank you very much.Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
keesindy
Members Picture


18 Jan 2019
11:48:44am
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

I am far from being an expert on the Portuguese colonies and this info may be of little help. This information about the Portugal colonial reprints is from a J. Barefoot booklet (from the 1960s?).

The originals will have "medium, toned" paper, perfed 12½ or 13½, with cream gum.

The 1885 reprints are on stout, very white paper. Perf 13½ medium holes (sometimes poorly cut) or perf 12½. Without gum or white gum.

The 1905 reprints have creamy, ordinary paper. Perf 13½ with large holes and sharp teeth. Shiny white gum.

Macau original crown types specifically: Originals perf 12½ and 13½; all 1885 and 1905 reprints are 13½.

I'll try to find some time to look through the International Society for Portuguese Philately journals I have here. I know some address the forgeries, but don't remember if they address the reprints or not. This is something I'll need to look into someday anyway.

Tom

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
nigelc
Members Picture


18 Jan 2019
12:22:54pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi Tom,

Thanks for bringing up this Barefoot booklet.

I'd forgotten I had one! Happy

I see my one is dated 1983.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
1938324
Members Picture


18 Jan 2019
01:02:19pm

Auctions - Approvals
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Thank you, Tom. This is all too much for me. I just Sold the stamp as a Reprint - priced accordingly.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
kgvistamps
Members Picture


Collecting King George VI from all countries, and King Edward VII and King George V from the West Indies.

18 Jan 2019
04:54:49pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

The Jamaica stamps posted in the original listing is not a reprint. The stamp was redesigned because they showed the Union Jack incorrectly. It is wrong on the original printing which was on paper watermarked Multiple Crown CA. It was corrected for the printings on paper watermarked Multiple Script CA. You can find the details in the Stanley Gibbons catalogue.

If you are interested in British Colony flaws, I have a web site showing over 200 print flaws. Use this URL if you are interested in seeing them.

http://www.kgvistamps.com/kgvistamps/flaws.aspx

Image Not Found

Like 
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

"Learn more about King George VI stamps at www.KGVIStamps.com"

www.kgvistamps.com
keesindy
Members Picture


18 Jan 2019
10:23:11pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi, Nigel!

nigelc wrote:

"Thanks for bringing up this Barefoot booklet. "



You're welcome. I was a member of the ISPP for a few years and obtained my copy back then. My copy has a yellow cover and only 16 pages. It has no publication date that I can find.

It has been helpful in identifying some of my Portuguese colonies stamps as I prepare them for sale, but I'm generally working backwards from the more recent issues and have not yet tackled the crown issue. It's difficult to find the time and then a slow process once I've found the time!

Tom


Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
pigdoc

22 Dec 2020
05:28:27pm
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Reviving this rich thread.

Recently, I've become a collector of the early Caribbean colonial issues. A seller was offering a wide selection of stamps of St Vincent (a British colony), and I managed to score a few lots yesterday, after doing some cursory catalog research.

The stamps of St Vincent of 1861 through 1879 (Scott numbers 1 through 23) are interesting, because they're all the same design. 13-23 are watermarked, 1-12 are not. Within these two series, the stamps are distinguished by perforations. There were 4 denominations/colors: 1p, 4p, 6p, and 1sh. The 4p and 6p are distinguishably by color variations, but the 1p and 1sh slate offer some opportunities to those who would forge the perforations. Margins on these stamps are typically very tight, which would seem to add to the perf-forger's opportunity. He can reperf and impinge on the stamp's design and it still looks typical for the issue.

Specifically, if a forger took a used 1p stamp perfed 14-16 (Scott 2) and reperf it to be 11-13 by 14-16 (Scott 11), he would increase its perceived value 100-fold. Similarly, if he took a used 1sh slate perfed 14-16 (Scott 4) and reperfed it to be 11-13 by 14-16 (Scott 8A) he would increase its perceived value 15-fold.

So, did that happen?

Here's an image from yesterday's auction of a Scott #2, which I scored:
Image Not Found
perfed 14-16 (rough perfs) Nice margins for the issue! Fodder that escaped the perf fakers!

Now, here's a stamp that was offered as Scott 11:
Image Not Found
perfed 14-16 on the sides, 11-13 on the top and bottom. Only check out those perfs at top and bottom. Real or faked? I shied from bidding on this item, because I thought they looked fake. Along the bottom, I see that the perfs that hit the "O" of ONE and the "P" of PENNY are out of line vertically with the rest - they're too high. And, the two perfs at the bottom right and the two below the "E" of ONE and the "P" of PENNY are spaced much wider apart than the rest. Along the top edge of the stamp, the two perfs on either side of the "V" are spaced much wider apart than the rest.

Here's one more lot, sold as a Scott 11:
Image Not Found
Perfs along bottom edge are difficult to evaluate. Along the top edge, the two perfs over the "CE" of VINCENT are definitely wonky. Real or fake? I shied away from bidding on this one also.

These two suspected fakes sold for around $80 each.

Such reperfs seem to be a class of difficult-to-detect fakes.
Whaddaya think?
-Paul



Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
HockeyNut
Members Picture


23 Dec 2020
03:35:01am
re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Interested in counterfeits against the GDR?
Then look here:
https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=25426#179981

Interested in counterfeits during WWII?
Then look here:
https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=24514#179183



Like
Login to Like
this post
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
Bobstamp

08 Jun 2018
11:58:10pm

Here's a suggestion: How about a thread about varieties, forgeries, and reprints that we have in collections? I recently discovered, through a web page, that several postwar Japanese stamps I have are all forgeries. Fortunately, even the original stamps aren't worth much (apparently the printing plates were sold to a Hungarian company, which proceeded to flood the philatelic market with "unofficial" reprints).

I'm thinking that it would be worthwhile if we could post clear images of our "problem" stamps, hopefully with images of the real thing. I know that I would appreciate learning how to differentiate between real and "unreal" stamps. I'll start with this Jamaica stamp, the original and an official reprint:

Image Not Found



Like 
6 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.ephemeraltreasur ...
Members Picture
TuskenRaider

09 Jun 2018
01:42:31am

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi Everyone;

I thank you Bob for this idea.

Not only do you have very sharp and clear scans, but the text that explains how to identify the two versions, is part of the bitmap file. So when I copy-and-paste this graphic image to a CorelDraw page it will automatically have everything that I need to distinguish these two different versions.

May the Force be with you...young Jedi!

Still just sortin'....
TuskenRaider

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.webstore.com/sto ...
pigdoc

10 Jun 2018
04:56:25pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Yes, thanks Bob, for starting this topic.

One of my collecting interests is Danish colonies, and the private packet post between La Guaira, Puerto Cabello, and St Thomas must be included. Founded by Robert Todd in 1863. Letter post stamps were issued 1864-1870 and used on this packet. All three series of these stamps were heavily forged by Spiro and others. So to collect this area, one needs to be well-versed in sussing them out!

Below is the first stamp issued in this series:
Image Not Found

Left is genuine, Right is a Spiro forgery. There are many distinguishing features that give away the forgery. A couple in particular are the general shading of the smoke, sky, and sea around the ship. Another is the shape of the last S in SAN TOMAS. In the forged stamp the uppermost part has a concave dent right next to the serif. And the bogus cancel on the forgery is very characteristic. It is never seen on genuine stamps.

I have several more forgeries to share from this packet post, so stay tuned!

My primary reference is The Private Ship Letter Stamps of the World, Part 1, The Caribbean by Ringstrom and Tester.

-Paul

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
pigdoc

17 Jan 2019
11:59:30am

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Time to revive this thread!

Here are some examples of genuine and forged stamps of the Centavo series in this private packet postage issue:

Image Not Found

Top one is genuine, from the first (1864) centavo issue, bottom two are forged copies, both Type I. There are six different forgery types described for this issue.

Here is another from the same (1864) issue:
Image Not Found

Again, top stamp is genuine, bottom two are forgeries. Forgery on the L is a Type IV also with a faked cancellation. The one on the R is a Type I forgery.

My primary reference is The Private Ship Letter Stamps of the World, Part 1, The Caribbean by Ringstrom and Tester. The author describes the forgeries of this issue, "...none are particularly dangerous." Hallmarks of genuine stamps are the shape of the horizontal part of the "L" in "LA GUAIRA" and extension of the shading lines across the right hand outer frame lines.

In the marketplace, the prevalence of forged stamps is similar to that of genuine stamps. It is as interesting to collect all the different forged types as it is to collect genuine stamps!

Who's next?
-Paul

-Paul

Like 
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
keesindy

17 Jan 2019
03:51:49pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

I posted this image in another thread quite a while ago, but some newer members might enjoy seeing this. It is Scott #59 and SG #81a.

I had purchased a Gambia collection containing this stamp. It wasn't identified in the sale and I didn't know anything about this variety because Scott doesn't list it. When I later purchased a Stanley Gibbons catalogue and learned about this variety, I went back and looked for any stamps I might have with the "dent." I was very happy to discover I had this one!

Tom

Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
Members Picture
keesindy

17 Jan 2019
04:14:38pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

These stamps are Scott Azores #112 violet color. I don't any have information regarding minor color varieties, but I believe the first copy is the normal color and the second copy is what I am calling dark violet.

Image Not Found Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
Members Picture
keesindy

17 Jan 2019
04:31:31pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

The Queen Victoria set of stamps for Somaliland Protectorate are overprinted India stamps. Stanley Gibbons identifies two types of overprints. Type A has the "B" of BRITISH positioned directly over the "M" of SOMALILAND. Type B has the "B" of BRITISH positioned over the "OM" of SOMALILAND. In some cases, the "B" is not clearly in either position, but somewhere between. There are other undocumented (as far as I know) variations in the sizes and vertical positioning of the overprint letters.

Image Not Found Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
Members Picture
1938324

18 Jan 2019
07:43:25am

Auctions - Approvals

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Can anyone identify this Macao #12 Portuguese Crown stamp as a Reprint or not? Thank you very much.Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
keesindy

18 Jan 2019
11:48:44am

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

I am far from being an expert on the Portuguese colonies and this info may be of little help. This information about the Portugal colonial reprints is from a J. Barefoot booklet (from the 1960s?).

The originals will have "medium, toned" paper, perfed 12½ or 13½, with cream gum.

The 1885 reprints are on stout, very white paper. Perf 13½ medium holes (sometimes poorly cut) or perf 12½. Without gum or white gum.

The 1905 reprints have creamy, ordinary paper. Perf 13½ with large holes and sharp teeth. Shiny white gum.

Macau original crown types specifically: Originals perf 12½ and 13½; all 1885 and 1905 reprints are 13½.

I'll try to find some time to look through the International Society for Portuguese Philately journals I have here. I know some address the forgeries, but don't remember if they address the reprints or not. This is something I'll need to look into someday anyway.

Tom

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
Members Picture
nigelc

18 Jan 2019
12:22:54pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi Tom,

Thanks for bringing up this Barefoot booklet.

I'd forgotten I had one! Happy

I see my one is dated 1983.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
1938324

18 Jan 2019
01:02:19pm

Auctions - Approvals

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Thank you, Tom. This is all too much for me. I just Sold the stamp as a Reprint - priced accordingly.

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

Collecting King George VI from all countries, and King Edward VII and King George V from the West Indies.
18 Jan 2019
04:54:49pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

The Jamaica stamps posted in the original listing is not a reprint. The stamp was redesigned because they showed the Union Jack incorrectly. It is wrong on the original printing which was on paper watermarked Multiple Crown CA. It was corrected for the printings on paper watermarked Multiple Script CA. You can find the details in the Stanley Gibbons catalogue.

If you are interested in British Colony flaws, I have a web site showing over 200 print flaws. Use this URL if you are interested in seeing them.

http://www.kgvistamps.com/kgvistamps/flaws.aspx

Image Not Found

Like 
3 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

"Learn more about King George VI stamps at www.KGVIStamps.com"

www.kgvistamps.com
Members Picture
keesindy

18 Jan 2019
10:23:11pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Hi, Nigel!

nigelc wrote:

"Thanks for bringing up this Barefoot booklet. "



You're welcome. I was a member of the ISPP for a few years and obtained my copy back then. My copy has a yellow cover and only 16 pages. It has no publication date that I can find.

It has been helpful in identifying some of my Portuguese colonies stamps as I prepare them for sale, but I'm generally working backwards from the more recent issues and have not yet tackled the crown issue. It's difficult to find the time and then a slow process once I've found the time!

Tom


Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"I no longer collect, but will never abandon the hobby"
pigdoc

22 Dec 2020
05:28:27pm

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Reviving this rich thread.

Recently, I've become a collector of the early Caribbean colonial issues. A seller was offering a wide selection of stamps of St Vincent (a British colony), and I managed to score a few lots yesterday, after doing some cursory catalog research.

The stamps of St Vincent of 1861 through 1879 (Scott numbers 1 through 23) are interesting, because they're all the same design. 13-23 are watermarked, 1-12 are not. Within these two series, the stamps are distinguished by perforations. There were 4 denominations/colors: 1p, 4p, 6p, and 1sh. The 4p and 6p are distinguishably by color variations, but the 1p and 1sh slate offer some opportunities to those who would forge the perforations. Margins on these stamps are typically very tight, which would seem to add to the perf-forger's opportunity. He can reperf and impinge on the stamp's design and it still looks typical for the issue.

Specifically, if a forger took a used 1p stamp perfed 14-16 (Scott 2) and reperf it to be 11-13 by 14-16 (Scott 11), he would increase its perceived value 100-fold. Similarly, if he took a used 1sh slate perfed 14-16 (Scott 4) and reperfed it to be 11-13 by 14-16 (Scott 8A) he would increase its perceived value 15-fold.

So, did that happen?

Here's an image from yesterday's auction of a Scott #2, which I scored:
Image Not Found
perfed 14-16 (rough perfs) Nice margins for the issue! Fodder that escaped the perf fakers!

Now, here's a stamp that was offered as Scott 11:
Image Not Found
perfed 14-16 on the sides, 11-13 on the top and bottom. Only check out those perfs at top and bottom. Real or faked? I shied from bidding on this item, because I thought they looked fake. Along the bottom, I see that the perfs that hit the "O" of ONE and the "P" of PENNY are out of line vertically with the rest - they're too high. And, the two perfs at the bottom right and the two below the "E" of ONE and the "P" of PENNY are spaced much wider apart than the rest. Along the top edge of the stamp, the two perfs on either side of the "V" are spaced much wider apart than the rest.

Here's one more lot, sold as a Scott 11:
Image Not Found
Perfs along bottom edge are difficult to evaluate. Along the top edge, the two perfs over the "CE" of VINCENT are definitely wonky. Real or fake? I shied away from bidding on this one also.

These two suspected fakes sold for around $80 each.

Such reperfs seem to be a class of difficult-to-detect fakes.
Whaddaya think?
-Paul



Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
HockeyNut

23 Dec 2020
03:35:01am

re: Forgeries/varieties/reprints

Interested in counterfeits against the GDR?
Then look here:
https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=25426#179981

Interested in counterfeits during WWII?
Then look here:
https://stamporama.com/discboard/disc_main.php?action=20&id=24514#179183



Like
Login to Like
this post
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com