What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


General Philatelic/Gen. Discussion : Some Fun Revenues

 

Author
Postings
StampWrangler
Members Picture


06 Aug 2018
11:09:41pm
I recently came across this photo with an Internal Revenue Proprietary stamp on the back of it. I've read that the Proprietary stamps were for tax on items such as playing cards, patent medicines and luxuries, and for various legal documents, stocks, transactions and various legal services. I guess photographs were maybe a taxable "luxury"? And of course, I'll never know who the fellow is - wish I knew something about him!

Image Not Found
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
StampWrangler
Members Picture


06 Aug 2018
11:13:29pm
re: Some Fun Revenues

Another fun revenue on cover
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
StampWrangler
Members Picture


06 Aug 2018
11:21:31pm
re: Some Fun Revenues

This one is attached to the last page of a 3-page handwritten document, I'll spare you the other 2 pages.
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
StampWrangler
Members Picture


06 Aug 2018
11:32:44pm
re: Some Fun Revenues

Ok my last one for now.
Image Not Found
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
51Studebaker
Members Picture


Dialysis, damned if you do...dead if you don't

07 Aug 2018
02:48:39am
re: Some Fun Revenues

"I recently came across this photo with an Internal Revenue Proprietary stamp on the back of it. I've read that the Proprietary stamps were for tax on items such as playing cards, patent medicines and luxuries, and for various legal documents, stocks, transactions and various legal services. I guess photographs were maybe a taxable "luxury"?"


Taxes were needed to help raise money for the costs of the Civil War and reconstruction; so Congress implemented a new tax effective June 30, 1864. Revenue stamps were required on photographs only from 1864 to 1866.

The tax for photographs was as follows; "2c with a retail value of not over 25c, 3c for a photo costing over 25c but not over 50c; 5c for photos costing over 50c but not over a dollar; and for each additional dollar or fraction of a dollar, another 5c." The revenue stamp was to be attached to the back of the photograph.

Also note that virtually any type of revenue stamp might be used on photographs. It was difficult to maintain all the various types of revenue stamps required and they were having a hard time keeping up with the demand for stamps. Business owners got mad so matching usage was only required up to December 25, 1862; after that interchangeable usages were allowed.

Lastly, fakes of these are common. Cancels typically did not tie the stamp on the photograph (many were ‘precancelled’) so it is easy to simply slap one on a photograph. Only buy these from a known quality seller or if you have significant experience in this area.
Don

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"Current Score... Don 1 - Cancer 0"

stampsmarter.org
StampWrangler
Members Picture


07 Aug 2018
03:16:51pm
re: Some Fun Revenues

Thank you Don, that was great education! I don't know where this came from. Possibly/probably from my mom's collection, and no idea where she got it from, but it would have been 50-60 years ago when she acquired it.

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

 

Author/Postings
Members Picture
StampWrangler

06 Aug 2018
11:09:41pm

I recently came across this photo with an Internal Revenue Proprietary stamp on the back of it. I've read that the Proprietary stamps were for tax on items such as playing cards, patent medicines and luxuries, and for various legal documents, stocks, transactions and various legal services. I guess photographs were maybe a taxable "luxury"? And of course, I'll never know who the fellow is - wish I knew something about him!

Image Not Found
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
StampWrangler

06 Aug 2018
11:13:29pm

re: Some Fun Revenues

Another fun revenue on cover
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
StampWrangler

06 Aug 2018
11:21:31pm

re: Some Fun Revenues

This one is attached to the last page of a 3-page handwritten document, I'll spare you the other 2 pages.
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
StampWrangler

06 Aug 2018
11:32:44pm

re: Some Fun Revenues

Ok my last one for now.
Image Not Found
Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
51Studebaker

Dialysis, damned if you do...dead if you don't
07 Aug 2018
02:48:39am

re: Some Fun Revenues

"I recently came across this photo with an Internal Revenue Proprietary stamp on the back of it. I've read that the Proprietary stamps were for tax on items such as playing cards, patent medicines and luxuries, and for various legal documents, stocks, transactions and various legal services. I guess photographs were maybe a taxable "luxury"?"


Taxes were needed to help raise money for the costs of the Civil War and reconstruction; so Congress implemented a new tax effective June 30, 1864. Revenue stamps were required on photographs only from 1864 to 1866.

The tax for photographs was as follows; "2c with a retail value of not over 25c, 3c for a photo costing over 25c but not over 50c; 5c for photos costing over 50c but not over a dollar; and for each additional dollar or fraction of a dollar, another 5c." The revenue stamp was to be attached to the back of the photograph.

Also note that virtually any type of revenue stamp might be used on photographs. It was difficult to maintain all the various types of revenue stamps required and they were having a hard time keeping up with the demand for stamps. Business owners got mad so matching usage was only required up to December 25, 1862; after that interchangeable usages were allowed.

Lastly, fakes of these are common. Cancels typically did not tie the stamp on the photograph (many were ‘precancelled’) so it is easy to simply slap one on a photograph. Only buy these from a known quality seller or if you have significant experience in this area.
Don

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.

"Current Score... Don 1 - Cancer 0"

stampsmarter.org
Members Picture
StampWrangler

07 Aug 2018
03:16:51pm

re: Some Fun Revenues

Thank you Don, that was great education! I don't know where this came from. Possibly/probably from my mom's collection, and no idea where she got it from, but it would have been 50-60 years ago when she acquired it.

Like
Login to Like
this post
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com