Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Regards to all...
Ralph
Login to Like
this post
Hi Ralph,
A variety is typically considered a constant across a significant part of the production run. Rust or scratch on a printing plate often results in a stamp being listed as a variety. Non-constant things like a speck of dust or other foreign material which prohibits proper inking is not a variety but instead is considered a ‘freak’ or ‘oddity’ and do not get picked up by catalogs as a variety.
But I agree with the article in the sense that fly-speccing is getting more and more ‘detailed’ as technology has increased. Most hobbyists now have high resolution scanners and some are calling out even the tiniest of differences in printings. I have seen some people almost down to pixel levels.
Don
Login to Like
this post
When you drill down to that level, you find that every single stamp is unique as none will be a 100% exact duplicate of another. It's still fun to do sometimes.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
11:36:07am
I like to consider what can be seen with the naked eye
as a variety, although magnification can be used to
discover the anomaly. Using IR or UV lights can yield
a Variety, but again, only as long as it is just the light.
Others may differ, but there are enough stamps and
differences visible to the normal vision to keep me busy.
I do use the electron Microscope to examine stamps,
and to make measurements, but then if I cannot see
what ever caught my eye expanded, it is at best an oddity.
Login to Like
this post
SOR member Lee Cohen never spent much time looking at “little specks of ink” on his stamps until he came across an interesting variation of Iran stamp Scott #86 in a retired APS circuit book. Take a look and read more about it here: Flyspecking or a Variety?
Regards to all...
Ralph
Login to Like
this post
re: New Article - Flyspecking or a Variety?
Hi Ralph,
A variety is typically considered a constant across a significant part of the production run. Rust or scratch on a printing plate often results in a stamp being listed as a variety. Non-constant things like a speck of dust or other foreign material which prohibits proper inking is not a variety but instead is considered a ‘freak’ or ‘oddity’ and do not get picked up by catalogs as a variety.
But I agree with the article in the sense that fly-speccing is getting more and more ‘detailed’ as technology has increased. Most hobbyists now have high resolution scanners and some are calling out even the tiniest of differences in printings. I have seen some people almost down to pixel levels.
Don
Login to Like
this post
re: New Article - Flyspecking or a Variety?
When you drill down to that level, you find that every single stamp is unique as none will be a 100% exact duplicate of another. It's still fun to do sometimes.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Silence in the face of adversity is the father of complicity and collusion, the first cousins of conspiracy..
13 Dec 2018
11:36:07am
re: New Article - Flyspecking or a Variety?
I like to consider what can be seen with the naked eye
as a variety, although magnification can be used to
discover the anomaly. Using IR or UV lights can yield
a Variety, but again, only as long as it is just the light.
Others may differ, but there are enough stamps and
differences visible to the normal vision to keep me busy.
I do use the electron Microscope to examine stamps,
and to make measurements, but then if I cannot see
what ever caught my eye expanded, it is at best an oddity.
Login to Like
this post