it looks like it has been thinned, perhaps in removing tape or a meter. the thin area is not consistent, so it's not a paper type
I have to agree with amsd, it isn't translucent.
Rob
Hi to all,
Thanks for that.
I am rehousing all the pedecimal Christmas stamps, so I will keep looking.
Regard
Horamakhet
Hi to all,
How about these four?
Regards
Horamakhet
Hi Horamakhet
Lightly run your finger over the length of the back, if the entire back has a uniform feel (the same all over) it's translucent, if the back feels thick and thin, then the stamp had been thinned when it was removed.
The best way to do it, which I fully recommend, is to get a micrometer and measure the stamp.
Rob
Hi Rob
Thanks for that,
Will do
Horamakhet
Hi to all,
An example of see through paper or is it just translucent?
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
it looks like it has been thinned, perhaps in removing tape or a meter. the thin area is not consistent, so it's not a paper type
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
I have to agree with amsd, it isn't translucent.
Rob
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
Hi to all,
Thanks for that.
I am rehousing all the pedecimal Christmas stamps, so I will keep looking.
Regard
Horamakhet
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
Hi to all,
How about these four?
Regards
Horamakhet
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
Hi Horamakhet
Lightly run your finger over the length of the back, if the entire back has a uniform feel (the same all over) it's translucent, if the back feels thick and thin, then the stamp had been thinned when it was removed.
The best way to do it, which I fully recommend, is to get a micrometer and measure the stamp.
Rob
re: 1960 CHRISTMAS, THIN OR TRANSLUCENT
Hi Rob
Thanks for that,
Will do
Horamakhet