Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
08:58:36pm
Here's a way to tell one from another!
First of all, neither perforation gauge not watermark detector will help. All the issues are perf 11 x 12, and all are watermarked Crown and GvR (Scott wmk #34). So where to start?
The easiest path is to start with the latest issue and work backwards.
The last issue (Scott #222-24) is the easiest to tell. It is called the "Waterlow re-engraved issue". Look at this picture:
The Waterlow re-engraved issue of 1934 (Scott 222-4) has a cross-hatched background behind the king's head. All the others have only horizontal lines. If your's is cross hatched, you've identified it! If it has horizontal lines, more investigation is necessary.
Ok, so you have horizontal lines -- could still be one of three issues. Look at this picture.
See the dot in the top center of the stamp in back? If your stamp has one, you have identified it. Only the Bradbury Wilkinson (BW) printing of 1919 has the dot (Scott #179-181). If the dot is there, it's definite, but not all the BW stamps have the dot! so the absence of the dot proves nothing!
No dot? Check the vertical dimension, from outer frame-line to outer frame line. The BW stamps are 22 3/4mm. If that's yours, you have Scott #179-81 -- dot or no dot! The remaining two possibilities are only 22mm. The difference doesn't sound like much, but if you have a good perf gauge, it should have a precise millimeter scale, and the difference is obvious. These pictures are not to scale!!
So your stamp is 22mm high! (It had better be at this point, or you missed something!) Still two choices -- the two earliest printings. Scott #173-176 was printed by Waterlow Brothers & Layton Printing in 1913. Scott #173a-75a was printed by De La Rue & Co.
Look at this picture:
Now you look at the perfs. De La Rue (#173a-75a) has two big teeth top right and top left, plus smaller perf holes. This is the trickiest step and a reference copy would help a lot. But look at a few and you will soon see the difference.
Now go to your local stamp club and be the expert!
Roy
6 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Learn something new everyday. You make it so simple Roy.
Thank you.
Grant
Login to Like
this post
Thanks Roy,Very helpful
Lee
Login to Like
this post
wow, I've got one these stamps.... I'm eager to measure it now! thank you for this post, its so fun to learn something new about a "plain old stamp" I've owned for ages.
Login to Like
this post
08:28:24am
Thanks Roy.
Login to Like
this post
Roy:
I do not (yet) have these stamps but have printed your tutorial and filed it with my "just in case" papers.
Thanks for the education.
John Derry
Login to Like
this post
This is so simple that even I can follow it. Thanks so much!
Andrew
Login to Like
this post
Thanks for that information Roy. It certainly helps simplify a sometimes boring task.
I don't recall having ever seen a "dot" on any of the stamps that I have gone through, and, so this will really aid in the identification of them.
Mike
Login to Like
this post
Very useful Roy! Thanks. 
Login to Like
this post
Wow,
Very interesting and I don't even collect GB!
Dave N.
Login to Like
this post
Thank you Roy! Definitely one of my favorite Great Britain issues!
Login to Like
this post
07:18:23pm
@pre1940classics
Mine too! I just bought these:
(Waterlow re-engraved Scott 222-24)
Can hardly wait until they arrive!
Roy
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Nice color and centering, esp. on the 10' since that is the priciest piece!
Login to Like
this post
Excellent tutorial! Thank you Roy!
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Indeed very thorough information, thanks a million!
Login to Like
this post
Great information on a subject I've spent hours trying to properly understand. Thanks Roy for simplifying it for all of us.
Login to Like
this post
Best info I've ever seen here. I'll bet Lacey taught you that.
Login to Like
this post
Thanks for the reminder. We have so many good tips, analyses and information buried in old discussion posts. Oh how I wish they could all be indexed and searchable. Great info Roy!
rrr...
Login to Like
this post
BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50 - Easy browsing 300 categories
04 Apr 2012
08:58:36pm
This very popular issue causes a quite a bit of confusion, but it's really quite simple to identify one from another. There are four different issues (except there is only one 1 pound green)
Here's a way to tell one from another!
First of all, neither perforation gauge not watermark detector will help. All the issues are perf 11 x 12, and all are watermarked Crown and GvR (Scott wmk #34). So where to start?
The easiest path is to start with the latest issue and work backwards.
The last issue (Scott #222-24) is the easiest to tell. It is called the "Waterlow re-engraved issue". Look at this picture:
The Waterlow re-engraved issue of 1934 (Scott 222-4) has a cross-hatched background behind the king's head. All the others have only horizontal lines. If your's is cross hatched, you've identified it! If it has horizontal lines, more investigation is necessary.
Ok, so you have horizontal lines -- could still be one of three issues. Look at this picture.
See the dot in the top center of the stamp in back? If your stamp has one, you have identified it. Only the Bradbury Wilkinson (BW) printing of 1919 has the dot (Scott #179-181). If the dot is there, it's definite, but not all the BW stamps have the dot! so the absence of the dot proves nothing!
No dot? Check the vertical dimension, from outer frame-line to outer frame line. The BW stamps are 22 3/4mm. If that's yours, you have Scott #179-81 -- dot or no dot! The remaining two possibilities are only 22mm. The difference doesn't sound like much, but if you have a good perf gauge, it should have a precise millimeter scale, and the difference is obvious. These pictures are not to scale!!
So your stamp is 22mm high! (It had better be at this point, or you missed something!) Still two choices -- the two earliest printings. Scott #173-176 was printed by Waterlow Brothers & Layton Printing in 1913. Scott #173a-75a was printed by De La Rue & Co.
Look at this picture:
Now you look at the perfs. De La Rue (#173a-75a) has two big teeth top right and top left, plus smaller perf holes. This is the trickiest step and a reference copy would help a lot. But look at a few and you will soon see the difference.
Now go to your local stamp club and be the expert!
Roy
6 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
09:13:52pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Learn something new everyday. You make it so simple Roy.
Thank you.
Grant
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Thanks Roy,Very helpful
Lee
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
wow, I've got one these stamps.... I'm eager to measure it now! thank you for this post, its so fun to learn something new about a "plain old stamp" I've owned for ages.
Login to Like
this post
webmaster for the ISWSC http://iswsc.org and ATA http://www.americantopicalassn.org
05 Apr 2012
08:28:24am
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Thanks Roy.
Login to Like
this post
The past is a foreign country, they do things different there.
05 Apr 2012
03:25:07pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Roy:
I do not (yet) have these stamps but have printed your tutorial and filed it with my "just in case" papers.
Thanks for the education.
John Derry
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
This is so simple that even I can follow it. Thanks so much!
Andrew
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Thanks for that information Roy. It certainly helps simplify a sometimes boring task.
I don't recall having ever seen a "dot" on any of the stamps that I have gone through, and, so this will really aid in the identification of them.
Mike
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Very useful Roy! Thanks.
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Wow,
Very interesting and I don't even collect GB!
Dave N.
Login to Like
this post
07:12:32pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Thank you Roy! Definitely one of my favorite Great Britain issues!
Login to Like
this post
BuckaCover.com - 80,000 covers priced 60c to $1.50 - Easy browsing 300 categories
08 Apr 2012
07:18:23pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
@pre1940classics
Mine too! I just bought these:
(Waterlow re-engraved Scott 222-24)
Can hardly wait until they arrive!
Roy
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
10:20:50pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Nice color and centering, esp. on the 10' since that is the priciest piece!
Login to Like
this post
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Excellent tutorial! Thank you Roy!
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Indeed very thorough information, thanks a million!
Login to Like
this post
06:00:36pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Great information on a subject I've spent hours trying to properly understand. Thanks Roy for simplifying it for all of us.
Login to Like
this post
Dogs are my favorite people. I hang with this one as often as I can.
25 May 2021
06:36:58pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Best info I've ever seen here. I'll bet Lacey taught you that.
Login to Like
this post
Retired Ap. Book Mod, Pres Golden Gate Stamp Club, Hi Tech Consultant
25 May 2021
10:35:41pm
re: A short tutorial on Great Britain Seahorse issues
Thanks for the reminder. We have so many good tips, analyses and information buried in old discussion posts. Oh how I wish they could all be indexed and searchable. Great info Roy!
rrr...
Login to Like
this post