Not sure why Scott skipped the #50; that is still so for the 2012 edition and the 2011 Scott Classic catalogue.
There are four main entries for that design in Gibbons; three match the three main entries listed in Scott (49, 51, 52); the fourth main entry is from 1896 and is listed as #65 "deep blue" in Gibbons, which is variant #49b in the Scott Classic.
Peter
Thanks Peter, just another mystery, I guess.
Theron.
"the fourth main entry is from 1896 and is listed as #65 "deep blue" in Gibbons, which is variant #49b in the Scott Classic."
Great tracking; why do they do that? (Scott, that is). It can't be "rarity" or number issued, is it?
"Great tracking; why do they do that? (Scott, that is). It can't be "rarity" or number issued, is it?"
Maybe Scott will finally take away Canada #32 and give it #24d, where it belongs
For those who believe in reincarnation:
be forewarned that Scott is going to be
overborne with editors.
John Derry
Hi, in putting some new acquisition into my Newfoundland album, I noticed that Scott does not list a #50, but skips from 49 to 51. Does anyone know why? Now, my Scott and Unitrade are getting old, so perhaps this has been changed in the recent catalogues. Thanks, Theron.
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
Not sure why Scott skipped the #50; that is still so for the 2012 edition and the 2011 Scott Classic catalogue.
There are four main entries for that design in Gibbons; three match the three main entries listed in Scott (49, 51, 52); the fourth main entry is from 1896 and is listed as #65 "deep blue" in Gibbons, which is variant #49b in the Scott Classic.
Peter
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
Thanks Peter, just another mystery, I guess.
Theron.
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
"the fourth main entry is from 1896 and is listed as #65 "deep blue" in Gibbons, which is variant #49b in the Scott Classic."
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
Great tracking; why do they do that? (Scott, that is). It can't be "rarity" or number issued, is it?
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
"Great tracking; why do they do that? (Scott, that is). It can't be "rarity" or number issued, is it?"
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
Maybe Scott will finally take away Canada #32 and give it #24d, where it belongs
re: Why does Scott not list a Newfoundland # 50?
For those who believe in reincarnation:
be forewarned that Scott is going to be
overborne with editors.
John Derry