That was before the Zip system, so perhaps the "postal zone"? Just a guess.
It's a machine number. Based on this cover, you should be able to find machine cancels with numbers at least ranging 1 through 9 for Minneapolis.
Minneapolis machine cancels of this type number up to 12 I believe. I have a number of this type but haven't gotten around to checking which ones I have. There are also some that are suffixed with the letter A, such as 1A.
Nice corner card!
Thanks guys. That helps. That makes the Minneapolis cancels, which are obviously very common, more interesting to collect. Antonio, have you seen any other MN post offices that use a similar machine cancel marking?
Regards ... Tim.
Saint Paul does. Larger towns like Duluth, Rochester and Saint Cloud might have them as well.
They are machine numbers and they do correspond to which post office branch it was cancelled in. Up through the 60's they went up to 12. Up until the sprayed cancels we see today they did 1 through 12 and letters a through d of each number. I didn't think anyone collected these but me. I have them all. Many cities did this. Chicago has the most numbers that I have been able to assemble. They went 1 though up at least 130. (My memory is failing me and I am at the office.) I can check tonight, but someone will probably beat me to the proper answer. Although not in Minnesota I tried to assemble all the Chicago numbers a few years back. At that time I was missing three. I should pull that out again.
Pat,
From all I know, the machine numbers distinguish machines in use at the same post office. Larger post offices had more than one machine, and similar to numbered or lettered hand stamps the machine number allowed identifying problems with the machine and/or operator. Machines were also sometimes identified with letters instead of numbers.
For the Chicago Main P.O., which is indeed a fruitful field of study I also have a good run of machines letters/numbers from A to Z and 1 to perhaps 40s from the early machines in use in the 1890/1900s (mostly flag cancels and their predecessor machines). As the efficiency of machines increased , the number of concurrent machines in use (and thus highest number to be found) decreased. Machines that have letters in addition to numbers, such as 1A, 4B etc. tend to be confined to the facer-canceller machines appearing predominantly in the 1970s which had two cancelling dies per machine.
The current ink jets (mostly) also have two cancelling dies per machine, identified with the letter L and T for leading and trailing. Depending on the size of the processing center, the highest numbers can go about into the 10s, perhaps 20s (14T, possibly for instance). I have a list somewhere and could check what the highest numbers appearing from a processing center anywhere in the U.S. would be. A machine number in the triple digits would strikes me as quite unusual.
Arno
Arno,
That makes sense, because the branch offices really are just a drop off point and everything ends up going to the main P.O. for distribution. I am going to look for those Chicago ones tonight. I would really love to see that list you have that tells me more about this.
Pat
Tim,
This is totally unrelated to your post, but I remember Becken Stamp shop from your cover. I think it was around up until some time in the 70's.
Pat
I still think Chicago went above 130 in their machine numbers. The highest I can find with a quick search is 126. I will look again later.
Smauggie,
This reminds me, Do you remember once upon a time in a land far, far away you were looking at some of my Minneapolis covers and said that I should do something with them? Well, I did. I started a collection of Minneapolis covers. I spent about four months organizing them and they are now in three volumes. I did a presentation of them to the Collector's Club last August and it was very well received. Thanks for the motivation. I just had them sitting around in shoe boxes. I started working on St. Paul, but it is not coming together as nicely. It keeps getting set aside for other projects.
Pat
Hello All,
The above posts are most interesting about machine cancels especially Rhinelanders' post.
I have asked the USPS about these numbers but they ignore me.
I collect cds and have many from Chicago and I too want to know the conversion of machine number to actual location where the cancel was done. I like seeing where the stamps came from.
Is there any website or publication where I can see this conversion for any US state?
Any help that any one can give would be greatly appreciated!
I've got about 400 US cds that I need to research. If you have any readable cds with postage stamps (SON, or offstamp) up to 1979 that you do not want, I would like to have them. I'll even pay the cost of posting to Australia.
Cheers
I picked up a few covers that have a Minneapolis cancel that have a number between the "Minneapolis" and the "Minn". See the number in red below:
What are these numbers for? In this case what does the "9" indicate?
Tim.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
That was before the Zip system, so perhaps the "postal zone"? Just a guess.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
It's a machine number. Based on this cover, you should be able to find machine cancels with numbers at least ranging 1 through 9 for Minneapolis.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Minneapolis machine cancels of this type number up to 12 I believe. I have a number of this type but haven't gotten around to checking which ones I have. There are also some that are suffixed with the letter A, such as 1A.
Nice corner card!
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Thanks guys. That helps. That makes the Minneapolis cancels, which are obviously very common, more interesting to collect. Antonio, have you seen any other MN post offices that use a similar machine cancel marking?
Regards ... Tim.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Saint Paul does. Larger towns like Duluth, Rochester and Saint Cloud might have them as well.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
They are machine numbers and they do correspond to which post office branch it was cancelled in. Up through the 60's they went up to 12. Up until the sprayed cancels we see today they did 1 through 12 and letters a through d of each number. I didn't think anyone collected these but me. I have them all. Many cities did this. Chicago has the most numbers that I have been able to assemble. They went 1 though up at least 130. (My memory is failing me and I am at the office.) I can check tonight, but someone will probably beat me to the proper answer. Although not in Minnesota I tried to assemble all the Chicago numbers a few years back. At that time I was missing three. I should pull that out again.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Pat,
From all I know, the machine numbers distinguish machines in use at the same post office. Larger post offices had more than one machine, and similar to numbered or lettered hand stamps the machine number allowed identifying problems with the machine and/or operator. Machines were also sometimes identified with letters instead of numbers.
For the Chicago Main P.O., which is indeed a fruitful field of study I also have a good run of machines letters/numbers from A to Z and 1 to perhaps 40s from the early machines in use in the 1890/1900s (mostly flag cancels and their predecessor machines). As the efficiency of machines increased , the number of concurrent machines in use (and thus highest number to be found) decreased. Machines that have letters in addition to numbers, such as 1A, 4B etc. tend to be confined to the facer-canceller machines appearing predominantly in the 1970s which had two cancelling dies per machine.
The current ink jets (mostly) also have two cancelling dies per machine, identified with the letter L and T for leading and trailing. Depending on the size of the processing center, the highest numbers can go about into the 10s, perhaps 20s (14T, possibly for instance). I have a list somewhere and could check what the highest numbers appearing from a processing center anywhere in the U.S. would be. A machine number in the triple digits would strikes me as quite unusual.
Arno
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Arno,
That makes sense, because the branch offices really are just a drop off point and everything ends up going to the main P.O. for distribution. I am going to look for those Chicago ones tonight. I would really love to see that list you have that tells me more about this.
Pat
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Tim,
This is totally unrelated to your post, but I remember Becken Stamp shop from your cover. I think it was around up until some time in the 70's.
Pat
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
I still think Chicago went above 130 in their machine numbers. The highest I can find with a quick search is 126. I will look again later.
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Smauggie,
This reminds me, Do you remember once upon a time in a land far, far away you were looking at some of my Minneapolis covers and said that I should do something with them? Well, I did. I started a collection of Minneapolis covers. I spent about four months organizing them and they are now in three volumes. I did a presentation of them to the Collector's Club last August and it was very well received. Thanks for the motivation. I just had them sitting around in shoe boxes. I started working on St. Paul, but it is not coming together as nicely. It keeps getting set aside for other projects.
Pat
re: A question on Minneapolis cancel
Hello All,
The above posts are most interesting about machine cancels especially Rhinelanders' post.
I have asked the USPS about these numbers but they ignore me.
I collect cds and have many from Chicago and I too want to know the conversion of machine number to actual location where the cancel was done. I like seeing where the stamps came from.
Is there any website or publication where I can see this conversion for any US state?
Any help that any one can give would be greatly appreciated!
I've got about 400 US cds that I need to research. If you have any readable cds with postage stamps (SON, or offstamp) up to 1979 that you do not want, I would like to have them. I'll even pay the cost of posting to Australia.
Cheers